課程資訊
課程名稱
專題研究︰道德建構論
Special Study: Moral Constructivism 
開課學期
105-1 
授課對象
文學院  哲學研究所  
授課教師
王榮麟 
課號
Phl7861 
課程識別碼
124 M5900 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期一6(13:20~14:10) 
上課地點
哲研討室二 
備註
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。請先徵得授課教師及申請者同意後,始得選課。
限碩士班以上 且 限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限:5人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1051Phl7861_construc 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

道德建構論在後設倫理學中最初是以康德式建構論的面貌出現,代表人物有Christine Korsgaard,逐漸成為後設倫理學的主要派別之一,不過近年來基於對康德式建構論和實在論的不滿,有的哲學家發展出休膜式的建構論以及亞里斯多德式的建構論,如Sharon Street和Mark Lebar。
 

課程目標
了解道德建構論和實在論的爭論,以及各種建構論之間的差異。
 
課程要求
採一對一方式進行,每個星期就指定閱讀內容進行討論,並於期末提出研究報告。 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
詳見課程進度 
參考書目
Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Bagnoli, Carla. 2013a. “Constructivism about Practical Knowledge.” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 153-182.
Engstrom, Stephen. 2013. “Constructivism and Practical Knowledge.” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 133-152.
Fitzpatrick, William. 2005. “The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korgaard’s Constructivism, Realism and the Nature of Normativity.” Ethics 115, pp. 651-691.
Lebar, M., 2008, “Aristotelian constructivism,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 25(1): 182–213.
Lebar, M., 2013, “Constructivism and particularism,” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 183-200
Galvin, Richard. 2010. “Rounding Up the Usual Suspects: Varieties of Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” Philosophical Quarterly 61: 16-36.
James, Aaron. 2007. “Constructivism about Practical Reasons.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 302-25.
O’Neill, Onora. 2003. “Constructivism vs. Contractualism.” Ratio (new series) XVI 4 December, pp. 319-331.
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
上課出席討論 
50% 
 
2. 
期末報告 
50% 
 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
9/12  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 1 
第2週
9/19  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 2 
第3週
9/26  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 3 
第4週
10/03  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 4 
第5週
10/10  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 5 
第6週
10/17  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 6 
第7週
10/24  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 7 
第8週
10/31  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 8 
第9週
11/07  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 9 
第10週
11/14  Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Chap. 10 
第11週
11/21  Bagnoli, Carla. 2013a. “Constructivism about Practical Knowledge.” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 153-182. 
第12週
11/28  Engstrom, Stephen. 2013. “Constructivism and Practical Knowledge.” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 133-152. 
第13週
12/05  Fitzpatrick, William. 2005. “The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korgaard’s Constructivism, Realism and the Nature of Normativity.” Ethics 115, pp. 651-691 
第14週
12/12  Lebar, M., 2008, “Aristotelian constructivism,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 25(1): 182–213. 
第15週
12/19  Lebar, M., 2013, “Constructivism and particularism,” In Bagnoli, Carla (ed.): 183-200 
第16週
12/26  Galvin, Richard. 2010. “Rounding Up the Usual Suspects: Varieties of Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” Philosophical Quarterly 61: 16-36. 
第17週
1/02  James, Aaron. 2007. “Constructivism about Practical Reasons.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 302-25. 
第18週
1/09  O’Neill, Onora. 2003. “Constructivism vs. Contractualism.” Ratio (new series) XVI 4 December, pp. 319-331.